Editorial

Editorial independence policy

This is the formal statement. It is short on purpose.

What we do not accept

How we fund the site

Out of pocket. The site is small and the operating cost is small. We pay for our own domains, hosting, and app subscriptions. If that ever changes, we will say so on this page before any change goes live, in plain language, with the date.

How we handle conflicts of interest

Neither reviewer holds equity, advisory positions, or paid relationships with any app developer reviewed on this site. If that ever stops being true for a specific app or category, we will recuse from reviewing that category and disclose the conflict on the article and on this page.

How we handle developer outreach

App developers do contact us. We read every email. We do not promise coverage in exchange for product access, demo time, or pitch decks. If a developer wants their app considered, the path is the same as for everyone else: the app gets included on the longlist for the next category review, and it gets evaluated against the others.

How we handle corrections

If we get something wrong, we fix it on the article, with a dated correction note at the bottom of the article. We do not silently rewrite published reviews. We do refresh lists annually with new dates and modified content; that is republishing, not retroactive editing.

How to verify any of this

Pull up any list on this site. Try to find an outbound affiliate URL. There aren't any. The only outbound network or external link you'll find is a single citation to the Dietary Assessment Initiative's 2026 calorie-app validation study, used in our calorie tracker articles as a source for accuracy claims.

See also: How we test apps · Contact.